logo-website

LITTE DATA THAT IS PRETTY BIG HOW TO TURN YOUR REPORT INTO A TRANSFORMATIVE ANALYSIS

It is a simple question with a pretty obvious answer … would you rather be a thinking partner or a

moderator? When I ask this question of people in our business, almost everyone raises his or her hand for the “thinking partner” option. Interesting… because almost everything we do — from what we call ourselves to developing our skill set to our ultimate deliverable – has “moderator” written all over it.

little-data-that-is-pretty-big-2
 

My hunch is that a lot of us spend more time being “moderators” than “thinking partners.” I would offer up that it is time to elevate our game in the face of competition that has emerged from so many areas in recent years: big data, social listening, behavioral economics, search companies (uh, Google) and the wide range of ad/design agencies that have developed proprietary insight processes. These people, processes and companies are all attempting to be thinking partners.

 

We are all competing for transformative insights. Clients look to us and other potential research partners to provide insights that will help them change and grow. What they really want and need are people who can:

  • Give strategic and conceptual advice.
  • Translate what just happened into something meaningful for them.
  • Light the path forward.

These are not moderating skills – they are consulting and thinking skills.

 

So, how do we elevate our game from moderator to thinking partner? First, we need to change our vocabulary. Vocabulary is important. It positions what we do, who we are and what we deliver. We need to stop calling ourselves “moderators.” I know we call ourselves “consultants” (as in the “C” in QRCA), but clients still call us moderators. I actually think “consultant” is too broad and slightly confusing. I now prefer the term “creative facilitator.” Changing vocabulary is a difficult and uphill task, but I see it as essential. “Creative facilitator” sounds more interesting, thoughtful and skillful than “moderator.” “Moderator” will stay in our lexicon for a long time, but I seriously feel it limits us, particularly in the face of sophisticated and high-powered competitors who are getting the ear of brand and insight clients.

 

We also call what we give to the client at the end of the project a “report.” I am now treating that as a swear-jar word. “Report” is a word (like moderator) that has been around for a long time and will be difficult to shake unless we start doing it ourselves. When clients ask me when I’ll be able to get them the “report,” I reply that the “analysis will be ready on         .” I also refer to “analysis” in the title. This is a subtle thing, but I think/hope it will continue to reinforce us as thinking partners.

In order to truly become better think- ing partners, we need to spend more time developing our thinking skillset. What are the thinking skills we need to devel- op? I see four that can set each of us apart against any competition:

  • Creative facilitator: thinks of respondent interaction more as conversation than questioning, and facilitates creative activities that intellectually and emotionally engage respondents and viewers.
  • Translator: provides constructive meaning to clients. What are your respondents really talking about, and what does it mean to your client?
  • Strategic and Conceptual Analyst: frames or reframes what was heard into concepts that are both thought provoking and inherently intuitive.
  • Storyteller: finds the story in your analysis and tells it as a story. Stories are remembered; reports sit on the shelf.

 

How much training time do we —   as qualitative practitioners — spend on getting better at leading discussions vs. translating, analyzing and turning that analysis into a transformative story for our clients? We spend a lot more time talking about leading discussions than turning those discussions into some- thing meaningful for our clients.

  • Roughly 90% of what clients hear in qualitative, they probably know already. And we probably spend 90% of our time “reporting” on that 90%. That is a moderator’s approach. That is reporting. That does not allow you time to more deeply analyze what you heard, conceptualize it and turn it into a story. Sometimes that is okay. And it is easy to rationalize yourself into thinking that is really all the client wants.
  • The other 10% is where the potential for transformative insights happens. It offers the potential to give your clients a new way of thinking about what they already know. This is where your analysis can give them a conceptual insight that can change the way they look at an issue or category. You can reframe everything you heard around a bigger insight that opens the door for greater opportunity.

Here’s what I try to do — spend 90% of my time on the 10%. It is not always possible, but taking this type of approach will change the way you analyze what you have heard. And if you know you will take this approach before the project, then you will naturally set up methods, techniques or activities that get to the big conceptual insight. You will be much more focused on the big transformative insights throughout the project, and your analytical time will not really be any longer than it is now. That is a thinking partner approach.

 

Thinking partner analytical Tips

If you approach analysis with a spirit   of fun and discovery vs. dread, you will do much better with it. A lot of people dread writing reports. I think it is more fun and intellectually stimulating to think of interesting conceptual ways to look at what was heard in a set of groups or interviews. It helps if you embrace this mindset.

Before you’re in the field, here are some tips to set up your project with the 10% in mind:

  • Put respondents in a narrative (instead of evaluative) mindset. Create exercises or activities that help them talk about themselves in a way that will be most helpful for your objectives.
  • Take some creative risks that get respondents to talk about the subject in ways your client has never heard. I particularly like drawing activities, collages and storytelling, but the important thing is to set up the activity in a way that will challenge respondents in a conceptual way.

 

When you are in the room or at their home or reading their comments, listen differently.

  • Listen for tensions and opportunities. Be okay with following the conver- sation instead of forcing it at times. When you introduce a subject, listen for how respondents talk about it not just what they’re saying.
  • Listening deeply and honestly (with an open mind and/or the client’s agenda) is one of the most important tricks to transformative analysis.
  • You are listening for When you listen this way, you hear what respondents are really talking about and can begin to conceptualize that, even while the group/interview is still going on.

 

Writing a transformative analysis begins with building a foundation that’s based more on emotion, beliefs, identity and tensions.

  • Start by reviewing your most emotive activity or exercise. This could be imagery from a group or online activity, photos from ethnography or a simple personification. I often start with whatever visual imagery is available and/or holds the most potential.
  • Starting with this helps you to build a more emotive-based foundation. You may develop some themes around emotions, beliefs or identity, and these can then become the lens you look through to analyze the rest of your data.
  • Even if your project is to evaluate advertising or new product concepts, you can incorporate imagery (from scenes or visuals) that connected most strongly with respondents. You can use this to establish emotional connections (or disconnections) they had with the creative. Creating an analysis in this way will elevate it versus simply reviewing which ads/concepts were most liked or most relevant.
  • Write down your instinctual feeling This could happen in a group or interview or immediately afterwards. If you have a visceral reaction to something you heard, it is undoubtedly important. You reacted this way for a reason. I am not just talking about big “aha” type moments. In fact, I am talking more about feelings that struck you or the overall mood of a discussion (depressing, optimistic, ambivalent or whatever it is you felt from a group or an individual respondent).
  • Think “transformation, transfor-mation, transformation.” Focus on the conceptual insights that will represent transformation for your client’s brand or business. Do not spend as much time on what they know already. The more you focus on transformation, the fresher it will feel.
  • Be sure that you are including con- ceptual insights in each of these four areas — emotions, beliefs, identity and tensions. If you are, then your analysis will be lifted, even if your client is not asking for this. It is possible to incorporate these into an analysis without calling them out overtly, if that makes life easier for you.
  • Organization is a big part of a thinking partner level of analysis. Giving clients a simple, yet elegant way of looking at things helps them and makes you look smarter. I am convinced that the ability to do this is learned and not innate with all of us. It is a matter of practice and mindset.
  • Finally, I believe in an impactful opening to an analysis. Hit them up front with the big emotive or belief-based understanding that will get their attention and set the tone for the rest of the analysis. It should make them think a little differently right away. Then tell your story from there.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

By Jim Chastain

realityCheck • st. louis, mo • jimc@realitycheckinc.com

 

 

 

4748 views
Others :
«   123  »
{DTOOL.DBOX_TITLE}
Dong cua so